Life in the Slow Lane

January 13, 2009

Baseball writers with Hall of Fame votes are morons

Filed under: Sports — pauljlane @ 4:13 pm


OK, maybe such a generalization isn’t fair. But there are a few in the ranks of the nation’s baseball writers who tarnish the good name of the many quality people who hold this job.

Jim Rice and Rickey Henderson were voted Monday into the Baseball Hall of Fame, and they’ll take their places in Cooperstown this summer. Their election brings up two strange points.

Rice, the Red Sox legend, made it in his 15th year of eligibility. If he was good enough this year, why wasn’t he the first 14 times? There have been several years during his time of eligibility when only one other person was elected (Ozzie Smith in 2002, Goose Gossage in 2008), so a lacking of quality candidates isn’t it. It’s not like he played since he first appeared, either, so he couldn’t bolster his numbers. The writers who flip-flopped must just hold to some outdated, childish, idiotic notion that he didn’t “deserve” to be a first-timer, or to go in on a “good year” (such as when George Brett, nolan Ryan and Robin Yount were inducted in 1999), or whatever.

As for Henderson, he made it in his first year of eligibility, but the all-time stolen bases king and game’s prototype leadoff hitter was only named on 511 0f 539 ballots (94.81 percent). How was he not a unanimous selection?

Granted, no one has ever been a unanimous pick (TOm Seaver, at 98.84 percent in 1992, was the closest). But why? Do some writers hold bitterness because their favorite wasn’t unanimous, so no one can be? Are they jealous that they aren’t as rich and athletic as these players? Do they just want to be talked aobut and have attention,a nd choose to do so by not nominating an obvious pick?

Whatever the reason, they’re pathetic people.

The Hockey Hall of Fame set the example that other sports should follow. Following Wayne Gretzky’s retirement in 1999, the hall waived the five-year waiting period and immediately inducted. The NHL also retired his No. 99 leaguewide, ensuring no one would ever again wear his number.

Yes, it breaks tradition. But you’re allowed to do something, even if “it’s always been done” another way. Hockey should be commended for even considering such a breech of etiquette. Exceptional players deserve certain exceptions.

Even with the “tradition” and “lore” of the national pastime, MLB would make a great move if it waived the waiting period for future sure-things such as Alex Rodriguez and Derek Jeter (I hate the Yankees, but the truth is the truth). it won’t because that might offend a few of the old-timers who insist on things being how they always were, but the idiots who wouldn’t vote for Henderson this year have no right to tell anyone else how to do things when they can’t get the easiest of decisions right.

Maybe this old-school insistence is why baseball continues to fade from the nation’s consciousness. Wake up, writers.



  1. They really should take away most of the writers’s voting rights. Read up on Corky Simpson, an older voter, who claims who made a mistake when he didnt vote for Ricky.

    A mistake not voting for one of the best of all time?

    What really annoys me though, Paul, is that Mark McGwire receives such poor support. Big Mac was arguably one of the 10 greatest power hitters in the history of baseball, and definitely the best while I was growing up. He used steroids when steroids were ALLOWED (why do we always forget this point when people condemn him?)

    It disgusts me to think the greatest players that I grew up watching won’t get in because of this. Roger Clemens, Bonds, Sosa…none of them will ever see the Hall…because of that same HOLIER THAN THOU attitude of the Baseball Writer’s Association. If we are removing people because of steroids we are going to need to take a sledgehammer to most of the statues in the MLB AND NFL Hall of Fame. I would venture to say Bruce wouldn’t be going in this year…Reggie White wouldnt have gone in…LT wouldnt have gone it….
    It would be nice if everyone could be Kirby Puckett and Tony Gwynn…but they aren’t. It comes down to alot of biases, and market bias is a huge one.
    If Andre Reed played for Dallas he would already be in the NFL HOF. If Joe Carter had played for the Yankees and Cubs and not Toronto and the Padres, he would already be in the MLB Hall of Fame and not DROPPED in his first year of eligibility.

    Comment by Bill — January 14, 2009 @ 12:45 am | Reply

  2. Bill,

    Playing for the Cubs doesn’t get somebody into the Hall of Fame faster or necessarily at all. Ask Ron Santo, Lee Smith and Andre Dawson about that. Setting the other two aside for a moment, Dawson should’ve gone in this year alongside Jim Rice – Dawson was the NL equivalent of Rice, and was a better all-around player! (Read my argument in Dawson’s favor on my blog at

    Lee Smith probably will be voted in eventually. Considering that Big Lee was the all-times saves leader for many years after playing during a era when saves often involved pitching more than one inning, I hope he gets in the Hall before Trevor Hoffman does. (I believe Hoffman belongs in the Hall, but Smith deserves to get in first.)

    As for Santo, the All-Star numbers he put up as a diabetic speak for themselves. But the veterans committee apparently will never elect anyone.

    Comment by Craig Wieczorkiewicz — January 14, 2009 @ 2:10 pm | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: